Three Cheers for the NYS Legislature!!!

Two big wins for the Climate Movement passed with the New York State Budget:

  • The All-Electric Building Act ends fossil fuels in new buildings under seven stories in 2026 and in all new buildings by 2029.

  • The Build Public Renewables Act mandates the NY Power Authority to build new large-scale renewable projects to meet our Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act goals while creating thousands of green union jobs and retiring polluting plants in Environmental Justice communities.

Two more Bills to work on:

  • Bigger Better Bottle Bill (S237May/A6353Glick)

  • The Packaging Reduction and Recycling Act (S4246Harckam/ A5322Glick)

Post by Joanna Lasher, LWV Saratoga
May 4, 2023

COP15 - A Global Action Plan to Protect Biodiversity

Understanding the Importance of COP15

By Nancy Tudor, Four League Environment Committee
April 20, 2023

You may be familiar with the United Nations Convention on Climate Change COP27 (Conference of Parties), but are you familiar with COP15, a conference on biological diversity? COP27 and COP15 are very closely related. However, climate change gets much more attention than biological diversity. Climate COPs have a clear focus to limit global temperature rises to “well below” 2°C above pre-industrial levels, while aiming to limit heating to 1.5°C, as settled under the Paris agreement in 2015. Currently, the UN’s biodiversity process does not have an equivalent focal point. In December 2022, nearly 200 governments from around the world came together in Montreal, Canada, to agree on a new set of goals to guide global action through 2030 to halt and reverse nature loss. Nature is critical to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals and limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Adoption of a bold global biodiversity framework that addresses the key drivers of nature loss is needed to secure our own health and well-being alongside that of the planet.

Nature is in crisis. For the past three decades governments have been meeting to ensure the survival of the species and ecosystems that undermine human civilization. Earth is experiencing the largest loss of life since dinosaurs, and humans are to blame. The way we mine, pollute, hunt, farm, build, and travel are putting at least one million species at risk of extinction, according to scientists. The sixth mass extinction in geological history has already begun, some scientists assert, with billions of individual populations being lost. The aim of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is for countries to conserve the natural world, its sustainable use, and to share the benefits of its genetic resources.

The COP15 agreement embeds the promotion of human rights and the “rights of nature” into a plan to protect and restore biodiversity through 2030. The “rights of nature” recognizes that nature and everything it encompasses—from animal and plant species to rivers, mountains, and the soil—possess inherent rights similar to those of human beings.

The COP15 agreement consists of four overarching global goals to protect nature and the Earth’s ecosystems.

  1. Agreement to conserve 30% of earth by the end of the decade: Protecting a third of the planet for the long-term survival of humanity, the most high-profile target at COP15.

  2. Indigenous rights at the heart of conservation: Several scientific studies have shown that Indigenous peoples are the best stewards of nature, representing 5% of humanity but protecting 80% of earth’s biodiversity.

  3. Reform of environmentally harmful subsidies: The world spends at least $1.8tn every year on government subsidies driving the annihilation of wildlife and a rise in global heating, according to a study earlier this year.

  4. Nature disclosures for businesses: This would require governments to ensure that large and transnational companies disclose “their risks, dependencies and impacts on biodiversity.” According to the UN, biodiversity loss is rapidly shooting up the agenda of corporate risks. Other targets focus on reducing pollution from all sources, requiring businesses to disclose their environmental impacts and dependence on biodiversity, managing agriculture and fisheries sustainably and implementing legal, policy and educational measures to encourage people to make “sustainable consumption choices.”

Conclusion

Every 10 years, governments agree on new targets on protecting biodiversity. The world has so far failed to meet any UN targets on halting the loss of nature. Awareness of this crisis is greater. The COP15 biodiversity agreement is not binding; therefore, it will ultimately be up to governments to ensure that those rights are protected as conservation projects are carried out to further the plan’s goals. Hopefully the agreement will ensure an adequate means of implementation, including financial resources, technical and scientific cooperation, and access to and transfer of technology to fully implement the COP15 global biodiversity framework.

All-Woman Flyover: The Plane Truth

Linda McKenney, March 10, 2023

Close your eyes and imagine you are about to board an airplane. What does the pilot look like?

Many of us were impressed and excited about an all-woman flyover at the Super Bowl. It’s progress!! Since it’s Women's History month, I thought it would be interesting to find out the nitty-gritty of said progress. I was also inspired by the comments of a friend. So, I did a little digging.

The Super Bowl event was celebrating the 50-year history of women being allowed to fly in the Navy. But the Navy’s original lineup was, according to Military.com, fifteen aviators -- only three of whom were women who were not pilots but flight officers (NFO). NFOs are experts in aircraft engine systems, navigation, meteorology, aerodynamics, flight planning and aircraft safety. They may serve as a co-pilot on occasion.

The crew was announced in a press release on Jan. 27, 2023. And yes, if you click on this link, you will find a 404 error message. Why? Apparently the announcement was initial information on the aircrew that was made public before the Navy had settled on the final lineup. So let’s make believe that an all-woman team was always the plan.

Google after Google, I could not determine why the Navy changed its mind and made the crew entirely women, except for the problem of a shortage of female Navy pilots.

A spokesperson for the commander of Naval Air Forces explained why having an all-female squadron would be difficult. "There are several challenges involved in gathering aviators from several different squadrons, and with women as 20% of the population in the Navy, it makes it harder, [especially because] only between 7% and 12% are pilots.”

But then, women who wanted to be Navy pilots or pilots in general have been facing challenges for years.

Bessie Coleman read about the air war in Europe during World War I and was convinced she should be up there flying, not just reading about it. In her attempt to find a flight school, she had two strikes against her. She was a woman, and she was black.

She heard that Europe had a more liberal attitude toward women and people of color, so she learned to speak French and earned enough money to go to Paris. She received her pilot’s license on June 15, 1921 from the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale. But she could not fly for the military, as military service in the US was not permitted for women.

In 1942, years after her death, President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Navy Women’s Reserve Act into law, creating what was commonly known as the WAVES -- Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service -- a division of the U.S. Navy, created to free up male personnel for sea duty in World War II. These women served as nurses or clerical workers. But there was a bigger need that women voluntarily filled.

The W.A.S.P. flew in. (Women’s Airforce Service Pilots)

The attack on Pearl Harbor meant that male pilots were needed for combat, which left a shortage of pilots to deliver newly built trainer aircraft to flight schools. Twenty-eight experienced civilian women pilots volunteered to take those ferrying jobs, forming the country’s first female flight squadron. That number grew to 1,074 women pilots.

Between November 1942 and December 1944, these women were trained to fly every aircraft in the Army’s arsenal. In addition to ferrying, they towed gunnery targets, transported equipment and non-flying personnel, and flight-tested aircraft that had been repaired before the men were allowed to fly them again. For over two years, the WASP went on to perform a wide variety of aviation-related jobs and to serve at more than 120 bases around the country.

What happened to the WASP?

In March 1944, a Congressional Bill was introduced to change the WASP status from civilian to military. This militarization bill was defeated in June and by December the program was officially deactivated. WASP lost their wings.

Through the 1980s and early 1990s, women lobbied hard for the right to serve equally with male counterparts, including flight combat. But even after they succeeded in 1993, there remained few corners of the military as overtly macho, if not downright misogynistic, as the world of fighter pilots.

Misogyny affects not only the way men think about women pilots, but also the way women think about the career opportunities available to them. If young women can’t dream of becoming a pilot – through role models in industry, or in their own minds – they’re less likely to pursue that career. Sadly, there are few examples of successful women pilots throughout the aviation industry. Which leads to the result of the following exercise:

Close your eyes and imagine you are about to board an airplane. What does the pilot look like?

Patricia Nugent: It Feels Bad

March 9, 2023
Reprinted from Vox Populi

[T]here was only one thing I wanted to say about women not having rights and protections equal to white men in the United States of America: It feels bad.

When asked to write a blog post for our local League of Women Voters about the recent U.S. Senate hearing on the Equal Rights Amendment, I reported to my desk armed with the latest data on women’s status in this country and rolled up my sleeves. There are many arguments to be made as to why our nation must move forward to ensure women full protection under the U.S. Constitution. And I was ready to pound them out.

But when I sat down to write, I first had to acknowledge and honor the despair I often feel as an American woman. As that washed over me, there was only one thing I wanted to say about women not having rights and protections equal to white men in the United States of America: It feels bad.

It feels bad that we are the only industrialized nation that doesn’t have women’s equality built into its constitution.

It feels bad that the ERA was proposed more than 100 years ago and hasn’t yet been adopted.

It feels bad that women have no rights in this country that cannot be reversed legislatively.

It feels bad to hear late Justice Scalia on YouTube declaring that the Constitution “doesn’t say you have to discriminate against women but doesn’t say you can’t.”

It feels bad to read current arguments, the same tropes from the 1970s, as to why women need protection instead of liberty – especially when put forth by other women.

It feels bad to see women standing on the dais behind politicians blocking the ERA.

It feels bad to hear women’s voices answering the phones of politicians who voted against the ERA.

It feels bad that American Catholic bishops are issuing directives to parishioners to reject equal rights legislation.

It feels bad that it’s periodically necessary for Congress to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, which one political party consistently votes against.

It feels bad to see merch for sale on the internet advocating “Repeal the 19th.”

It feels bad that The Handmaid’s Tale now reads more like nonfiction than fiction.

It feels bad that the tokenism of an all-female flyover at the Super Bowl is considered progress.

If feels bad that many of my feminist friends are suffering from resistance fatigue.

It feels bad to be considered less than by my government.

It feels bad to wonder if I might be reciting Susan B. Anthony’s final words on my own deathbed: “To think, I have had more than 60 years of hard struggle for a little liberty, and then to die without it seems so cruel.”

What feels good is that this enumeration of what feels bad pisses me off enough that I must continue working to make it feel better. For all of us.

Oh…and welcome to Women’s History Month, which also feels bad.

Copyright 2023 Patricia Nugent

How Black History is Killing Black Mothers Today

By Linda McKenney Feb. 21, 2023

“It’s not race, it’s racism,” said Tiffany L. Green, an economist focused on public health and obstetrics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “The data are quite clear that this isn’t about biology. This is about the environments where we live, where we work, where we play, where we sleep.”

What was Ms. Green talking about?

In the United States, black women are 2 to 6 times more likely to die from complications of pregnancy than white women. The numbers are impacted based on education, income and location. A groundbreaking study of two million births in California was the first of its size to show how the risks of childbirth vary by both race and parental income, and how Black families, regardless of their socioeconomic status, suffer the worst childbirth outcomes. And sadly the majority of those deaths were preventable.

Postpartum cardiomyopathy and blood pressure disorders, such as preeclampsia and eclampsia, were leading causes of maternal death for Black women. With prompt and correct treatment, these health issues do not have to be a death sentence.

Case in point. A daughter’s high blood pressure after giving birth left Wanda Irving in profound grief. Three weeks after giving birth to a baby girl, Shalon Irving collapsed and died from complications of high blood pressure. Yet Shalon had many advantages — a B.A. in sociology, two master's degrees and dual-subject Ph.D., comprehensive insurance and a rock-solid support system. These had not been enough to ensure her survival. Wanda says she lost her only daughter at the hands of “the covert bias of her medical provider and that very bias, fueled by structural racism, is the root cause of disparities in health care.”

Wanda’s TED talk - https://www.tedmed.com/talks/show?id=770778

If an educated, articulate woman wasn’t able to be heard and believed by her health care provider, is any black woman safe?

This writer searched and searched for the reasons why Black women are more likely to die during and after childbirth and only one reason resonated - systemic implicit bias. And this is where history comes into play. The myth that was propagated in the 1800’s that Black people have thicker skin and less sensitive nerves is amazingly still believed today.

Reporting pain that does not have visible evidence requires physicians to rely on judgment, and unfortunately physicians have shown a pattern of distrust when Black patients seek help with pain, especially Black women.

In addition, the “strong Black woman” cliche characterizes Black women as naturally resilient and self-sacrificing. This may encourage physicians to view Black women as more willing to push through distress. And it may silence those women to feel as though they need to suffer in silence.

What can we do? To address this maternal health crisis in America, Congressional leaders have been fighting for critically important policies like 12-month postpartum Medicaid coverage, which would ensure mothers have access to the care and support they need and deserve for the full postpartum period. But that’s not enough!

Public awareness and education, such as Wanda Irving’s Dr. Shalon's Maternal Action Project are critical. This project developed four pillars used as the base of their action and strategic partnerships. All the work that they do is centered around:

  • Storytelling

  • Empowerment

  • Community-Building

  • Education

They believe that the most powerful tool a Black mother has is her voice. Shalon’s voice is her mother.

References: