League of Women Voters of New York State Seeks to Intervene in Lawsuit Filed by DOJ to Protect Sensitive Voter Information

ALBANY, NY- Today, the League of Women Voters of New York State, represented by Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law (Brennan Center), filed a motion to intervene as a defendant in a lawsuit brought by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) to obtain the complete list of all registered voters in New York without proper basis and purpose. The DOJ is attempting to obtain voters’ sensitive data, including private information such as driver’s license numbers or partial Social Security numbers, data beyond what’s typically publicly available.  

“New Yorkers take pride in our state’s long commitment to fair and transparent elections,” said Erica Smitka, executive director of the League of Women Voters of New York State. “The Department of Justice’s attempt to collect sensitive voter data without cause undermines that trust and puts every voter’s personal information at risk. The League of Women Voters of New York is proud to stand up for voters, to protect their privacy and trust in the democratic process.”

In July, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) sent a letter to Board of Elections of New York State requesting the state’s complete and unredacted voter file, including voters’ addresses, dates of birth, driver's license numbers, and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers. The Board of Elections (BOE) of New York State released the public version of the voter registration list, but declined to turn over the unredacted voter files, citing state election laws, public disclosure laws, and federal privacy protections. In response, the DOJ filed a lawsuit in September against the Board of Elections of New York State, alleging that the failure to turn over the data violates the National Voter Registration Act, the Help America Vote Act, and Section 303 of the Civil Rights Act of 1960. The DOJ has also sued six other states in their attempt to create a national voter roll. 

“The Department of Justice should be protecting voters, not putting their personal information at risk,” said Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters of the United States. “There is no justification for the federal government to demand access to sensitive voter data under the guise of election security. These actions erode public trust and undermine democracy. The League will always work to protect voters’ privacy and ensure every American can cast their ballot free from intimidation or misuse of their data.”

The DOJ has a responsibility to protect the freedom to vote, but its recent actions would infringe upon these freedoms. The DOJ’s improper overreach into state data at the behest of the Trump administration would not make our elections any safer or more secure. It could instead jeopardize voters’ personal information and discourage them from participating in the democratic process.

As recent reporting shows, this threat to voters is compounded by the potential for this requested information to be misused by other agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for immigration enforcement. Our elections already have numerous safeguards in place to make sure only US citizens participate, a responsibility that election officials take seriously. 

“This overreach by the federal government is an attempt to seize personal information and take control over our elections when the Constitution gives the power to regulate and administer elections to the states or Congress,” said Brent Ferguson, director of strategic litigation at Campaign Legal Center. “Voters should have confidence that their information is secure. Attempts by the DOJ to retrieve sensitive voter data are an attack on Americans’ privacy and freedoms, including the freedom to vote.” 

“The DOJ’s demands for the voter files are one element of the Trump administration’s concerted effort to undermine American elections,” said Eileen O’Connor, senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice. “If its requests succeed, the department could amass a federal database of personal information about every registered voter in the country. The government could misuse this data to concoct more false claims about election fraud, target political opponents, or try to force states to remove voters from the rolls.”

Our democracy is strongest when every eligible voter can exercise their freedom to vote, and the League of Women Voters of New York State, Campaign Legal Center and the Brennan Center intend to work together to protect that freedom.

IMMIGRATION- The League’s Position

From LWVUS Impact on Issues, printed pages 167-168

Statement of Position on Immigration, as announced by the national board, April 2008:

The League of Women Voters believes that immigration policies should promote reunification of immediate families; meet the economic, business, and employment needs of the United States; and be responsive to those facing political persecution or humanitarian crises. Provision should also be made for qualified persons to enter the United States on student visas. All persons should receive fair treatment under the law. 

The League supports federal immigration law that provides an efficient, expeditious system (with minimal or no backlogs) for legal entry of immigrants into the United States.

To complement these goals, the League supports federal policies to improve economies, education, job opportunities, and living conditions in nations with large emigrating populations.

In transition to a reformed system, the League supports provisions for individuals already living in the country without legal permission to earn legal status.

The League supports federal payments to impacted communities to address the financial costs borne by states and local governments with large immigrant populations.

Criteria for Legal Admission to the United States

The League supports the following criteria for legal admission of persons into the United States:

• Family reunification of spouses or minor children with authorized immigrants or citizens.

• Flight from persecution or response to humanitarian crises in home countries.

• Economic, business, and employment needs in the United States.

• Education and training needs of the United States.

• Educational program opportunities.

• Lack of a history of major and/or violent criminal activity.

Administration and Enforcement

The League supports due process for all persons, including the right to a fair hearing, right to counsel, right of appeal, and right to humane treatment.
The League supports:

• Improved technology to facilitate employer verification of employee status.

• Verification documents, such as status cards and work permits, with secure identifiers.

• Significant fines and penalties for employers who hire unauthorized workers.

• Improved technology for sharing information among federal agencies.

• More effective tracking of individuals who enter the United States.

• Increased personnel at borders.

The League also supports programs allowing foreign workers to enter and leave the

United States to meet seasonal or sporadic labor needs.

US Residents Without Legal Permission to Earn Legal Status

In achieving overall policy goals, the League supports a system for individuals living in the country without legal permission to earn legal status, including citizenship, by paying taxes, studying civics, and meeting other relevant criteria. While policy reforms, including a path to legal status, remain unachieved, the League does not support deporting these immigrants who have no history of major and/or violent criminal activity.

Immigration Position from LWVUS Impact on Issues (includes history on pages 3-4)

NYS 2025 Legislative Session

Recap of LWVNY Environmental Efforts by Anne Erling

Despite increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and climate destabilization as a backdrop, environmental interests were largely snubbed in the 2025 NYS Legislative session that just ended.

Members of the four Capital Region county LWVs lobbied this year for four LWVNY priority environmental bills. Two were ongoing efforts from prior years -- the Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act (PRRIA - S1464/A1749) that requires companies to reduce the amounts of, and remove toxins from, packaging, and also contribute to the cost of managing the packaging waste that remains, and the Bigger Better Bottle Bill (BBB - S5684/A6543) that expands the types of beverages subject to deposit, raises the deposit fee, and increases redemption center revenues. This year advocates also lobbied for two new LWVNY priority bills, the NY Home Energy Affordable Transition Act (NY HEAT S4158/ A4870A) that amends NYS law to align utility planning with the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act which requires an end to unsustainable energy provision, and the Climate Education Bill (S2430/A4876) that adds climate topics to NYS curriculum requirements.

The Senate passed PRRIA, and advocates had secured promises from enough Assembly members to expect passage in that body as well, but despite adding the bill to the floor calendar for the last day of session, Speaker Heastie allowed the session to close without bringing the bill up for a vote. BBB and the Climate Education Bill failed to progress in any meaningful way in either house of the legislature. Faced with lack of movement on any important environmental bill, NY HEAT bill sponsors introduced two related bills at the end of session -- the Customer Savings and Reliability Act (S8421/A8889), which represented an amended version of NY HEAT as a whole, and a separate bill (S8417/A8888) that repealed only the “100 Foot Rule,” the requirement that ratepayers across the state cover costs for free gas hook-ups to building owners within 100 feet of a gas utility line. In the end, this small but important carve-out of NY HEAT is the only environmental priority bill that passed through both houses of the NYS Legislature.

Efforts are now underway to urge Gov. Hochul to immediately sign this 100 Foot Rule bill -- it will go into effect providing savings to ratepayers immediately upon signature. Efforts to gain passage of the other LWVNY priority environmental bills will continue into next year. A bright spot: since 2026 will be the second year of the current two-year legislative session, all bills will be able to build upon the progress they made this session. Significantly, PRRIA will be eligible to go straight to the Assembly floor when the 2026 legislative session begins in January. Why not spend the summer bringing this bill up in conversations, and find a few more people to contact Assembly members? It will be a significant treat to see this bill signed into law! 

FEDERAL JUDICIARY The League’s Position

LWVUS Announces New Federal Judiciary Position

In June 2025, the League of Women Voters national Board was pleased to announce the adoption of the new League position on the Federal Judiciary.

The Federal Judiciary position was adopted using the long-standing League practice of grassroots study to arrive at member understanding and agreement. The League of Women Voters of Saratoga County was among the 321 Leagues representing 45 states and the District of Columbia who participated in the study.

This position is now part of the League's official public policy positions and will be folded into the next edition of the LWVUS Impact on Issues. It will be added to the "Congress and the Presidency" subsection of the "Representative Government" section.

Statement of Position on the Federal Judiciary, as announced by the national board, June 2025

The League of Women Voters of the United States (LWVUS) believes that all powers of the US government should be exercised within the constitutional framework of the balance of powers among the three branches of government. The League believes that, within the bounds of the US Constitution, the overarching principles of transparency, accountability, independence, and ethics are essential to an effective federal judiciary. These principles are not only essential for a strong democracy but foster public trust in the federal judiciary and adherence to the rule of law, the essence of our constitutional democracy.

For the federal judiciary, the League supports the essential principles of:

Transparency: Federal court documents, proceedings, and rulings, including those in “shadow docket” cases, should be open and available to the public within the bounds of the law, recognizing the need for limited exceptions, such as legally protected sensitive information.

Accountability: Federal judges and Justices should be held legally and ethically responsible for the integrity of their actions, with enforceable consequences for violations.

Independence: Federal judges and Justices should act in accordance with the Constitution and statutory and case law, free from the influence of the other branches of government and free from shifting popular and political opinion.

Ethics: Federal judges and Justices should adhere to ethical standards of conduct that apply universally at all levels of the federal courts. There should be a meaningful enforcement process with judges and Justices subject to penalties for failure to comply with the standards.

The League believes that standards of conduct for federal judges and Justices should include requirements to disclose non-judicial income; other financial benefits including, but not limited to, gifts and hospitality; and investment holdings. Federal judges, Justices, and their partners or spouses should be subject to penalties for failure to disclose accurately and in a timely manner.

The League believes that standards of conduct should include a process that requires a judge or Justice to recuse themself upon evidence that a bias or reasonable perception of a bias exists for or against any party or issue raised in a case. A judge’s or Justice’s decision and rationale not to recuse, despite evidence raised in the court proceedings, should be disclosed in the court’s record.

The League believes that respect for precedent (stare decisis) under most circumstances contributes to a strong democracy and promotes predictability and stability of law. Stare decisis does not mean precedents cannot or should not be overruled, but that such instances should occur in exceptional circumstances.

The League believes that the elements of this position contribute to judicial integrity and are essential to a strong democracy. These elements exemplify what the League expects from the federal courts, building trust and buttressing the Courts’ legitimacy. Adherence to the principles of accountability, transparency, independence, and ethics ensures both a strong federal judiciary and a stronger democracy.

Saratoga League calls for County Charter Commission

The following letter requesting the appointment of a County Charter Commission was sent to the Saratoga County Board of Supervisors on May 12th and read at the Board of Supervisors' meeting on May 20th by Linda McKenney, Co-President.
Here is a link to the Board of Supervisors’ May 20th meeting.
The letter is read at timestamp 31:20.


May 10, 2025

Saratoga County Board of Supervisors
40 McMaster Street
Ballston Spa, NY 12020

Dear Board of Supervisors,

The League of Women Voters of Saratoga County asks the Board of Supervisors to appoint a Charter Commission to examine options for types of governance that Saratoga County might consider adopting. The goal would be for the Commission to recommend one system of governance for the County to adopt (including the possibility of readopting our current form). Said Charter Commission would be given the authority to weigh the advantages of each of the types of legislative bodies and of executive (decision making) structures and to recommend one legislative and one executive type.

In 1987 the Board of Supervisors created a 16-member 21st Century Commission. They issued a 113 page report that dealt with many issues and made many recommendations, among them recommendations about the structure of the County Government, the two most important of which were to “enact a local law for the creation of a county board of representatives by 1991”, and to “establish a schedule of regular review of the structure and responsiveness of our county government.“  They also said, “Although we believe the accomplishments of Saratoga County government compare most favorably with other counties, it is prudent to carefully consider: -as Saratoga’s population and budgets continue to grow, “will the present form of government be able to meet the needs of its County residents?” (p.87)  

We are currently operating under the same form of government we had in 1791 when our county was established. On the last Tuesday in May 1791, the Supervisors rode their horses or drove their carts to the meeting at the “dwelling house of William Mead, of Still-water.”

There have been many changes in the past 234 years, and we believe it is time to once again critically examine whether our current governance structure continues to meet our needs. The League of Women Voters of Saratoga County believes this issue should be reexamined and asks you to establish a Charter Commission.

Note that if you do not establish a commission, the voters of the county can initiate the process by filing a petition with the clerk of the legislative board which contains the signatures of at least 10% of the total number of voters in the last gubernatorial election (10,482) asking that the board establish a Charter Commission.

If the legislative body of the county does not adopt a resolution creating a charter commission on its own accord, within three months of the petition filing with the clerk of the board, the board is required to submit the question to the voters, by referendum, on whether to establish a charter commission. This question must be posed to the voters at the next general election occurring not less than five months from the petitions filing. If the voters approve of the formation of a charter commission, the board must appoint members within two months of the public referendum.

Respectfully submitted,

Ann Marie Pendergast and Linda McKenney, Co-Presidents
League of Women Voters of Saratoga County